
But we do have an
opportunity to solve at least SOME problems with the Common Core. From all I
can tell with my somewhat jaded professional eye, the Common Core Standards
really DO represent the first real shift in educational process. They move “instruction”
from teacher-directed content dissemination into an active, engaged,
student-centered process of thinking, sharing ideas, and learning. And it’s
really pretty simple! It’s a change on our part from structuring lessons with low-level
questioning to high-level thinking, asking ourselves, “How can we put the ball
in the kids’ court? What can we ask THEM to figure out?”
Of course critical
thinking is nothing new! As a social studies educator, I can attest to the fact
that we’ve been pushing it for decades, as has Gifted Ed. I took my GT certification
classes about 20 years ago. The class began with a projected graphic depicting
the distinction between regular ed. and gifted. It showed Bloom’s triangular
taxonomy flipped upside-down. In other words, instead of the bulk of
educational time being spent on memorizing facts like Bloom, et al found, it
noted that the greatest amount should be spent on creating new products and
ideas and evaluating solutions.
And I thought, “Why should
critical thinking just be the domain of the gifted?” In fact, low-performing
students are the very ones who CAN’T or WON’T TRY to do low-level stuff! The
pressure of “not believing they can get the right answer anyway,” is in fact at
least partially to blame for many discipline issues. Kids, like the rest of us,
thrive on challenge and excitement! They, like we, find enthusiasm infectious. That’s
what the Common Core suggests. The more enthusiastic teachers are about ideas and
the more they challenge their students to do and more importantly THINK; the
better. Classes are more interesting and fun, students are more engaged and
logically, happy, engaged students remember more and perform better.
All this from the Common
Core? Yes! Take the first standard, for example. Instead of placing the
emphasis on getting answers explicitly stated in text, the goal is to guide
students to make inferences from the stated clues. BIG difference! In teaching,
this means the questions change from what happened, who said what, or why, if
stated. These are replaced by: “Which event do you think had the greatest
impact and why?” “Who, if anyone, do you think deserves credit and why?” and any
other open-ended offerings that allow students to insert themselves and their
views into the content.

(Click here for a lesson example.)
We’ve used this simple approach and find it works beautifully! And now, we’d like to hear what other InspirEd Educators have to say!

(Click here for a lesson example.)
We’ve used this simple approach and find it works beautifully! And now, we’d like to hear what other InspirEd Educators have to say!
How
are YOU, your school, your district, and state implementing the Common Core?
What
are your colleagues saying about it? What’s working? What isn’t?
How
do YOU elevate the thinking processes in your classroom? How do students react?
We’re teachers and
educational reformers. We believe problems can be solved; and an InspirEd
community can change things if we work together and share ideas! So let’s get
the dialogue started!
By: Sharon Coletti
No comments:
Post a Comment